A common theme in mathematics is to replace the study of an object with the study of some category that can be built from that object. For example, we can
- replace the study of a group
with the study of its category
of linear representations,
- replace the study of a ring
with the study of its category
of
-modules,
- replace the study of a topological space
with the study of its category
of sheaves,
and so forth. A general question to ask about this setup is whether or to what extent we can recover the original object from the category. For example, if is a finite group, then as a category, the only data that can be recovered from
is the number of conjugacy classes of
, which is not much information about
. We get considerably more data if we also have the monoidal structure on
, which gives us the character table of
(but contains a little more data than that, e.g. in the associators), but this is still not a complete invariant of
. It turns out that to recover
we need the symmetric monoidal structure on
; this is a simple form of Tannaka reconstruction.
Today we will prove an even simpler reconstruction theorem.
Theorem: A group can be recovered from its category
of
-sets.