The Artin-Wedderburn theorem shows that the definition of a semisimple ring is enormously restrictive. Even fails to be semisimple! A less restrictive notion, but one that still captures the notion of a ring which can be understood by how it acts on simple (left) modules, is that of a semiprimitive or Jacobson semisimple ring, one [...]
Posts Tagged ‘adjoint functors’
The Jacobson radical
Posted in module theory, representation theory, ring theory, tagged adjoint functors, quivers on May 30, 2012 | 2 Comments »
Structures on hom-sets
Posted in algebraic geometry, category theory, commutative algebra, tagged adjoint functors, representable functors, universal properties on January 21, 2011 | 3 Comments »
Suppose I hand you a commutative ring . I stipulate that you are only allowed to work in the language of the category of commutative rings; you can only refer to objects and morphisms. (That means you can’t refer directly to elements of , and you also can’t refer directly to the multiplication or addition [...]
Boolean rings, ultrafilters, and Stone’s representation theorem
Posted in category theory, commutative algebra, logic and set theory, order theory, topology, tagged adjoint functors, axiom of choice, duality, ultrafilters, universal properties on November 22, 2010 | 8 Comments »
Recently, I have begun to appreciate the use of ultrafilters to clean up proofs in certain areas of mathematics. I’d like to talk a little about how this works, but first I’d like to give a hefty amount of motivation for the definition of an ultrafilter. Terence Tao has already written a great introduction to [...]
The adjoint functor theorem for posets
Posted in category theory, order theory, tagged abstract nonsense, adjoint functors, universal properties, Yoneda lemma on October 22, 2010 | 3 Comments »
Recently in Measure Theory we needed the following lemma. Lemma: Let be non-constant, right-continuous and non-decreasing, and let . Define by . Then is left-continuous and non-decreasing. Moreover, for and , . If you’re categorically minded, this last condition should remind you of the definition of a pair of adjoint functors. In fact it is [...]
The connected components functor
Posted in category theory, tagged abstract nonsense, adjoint functors on December 26, 2009 | 13 Comments »
I skimmed through books 1, 4, and 5 of my new batch and am currently skimming through 3; it seems I don’t have the mathematical prerequisites to get much out of 2. It will take me a long time to digest all of the interesting things I’ve learned, but I thought I’d discuss an interesting [...]
The ideal-variety correspondence
Posted in algebraic geometry, commutative algebra, tagged adjoint functors, Galois theory, MaBloWriMo, Nullstellensatz on November 30, 2009 | Leave a Comment »
I guess I didn’t plan this very well! Instead of completing one series I ended one and am right in the middle of another. Well, I’d really like to continue this series, but seeing as how finals are coming up I probably won’t be able to maintain the one-a-day pace. So I’ll just stop tagging [...]
The induced representation
Posted in category theory, module theory, representation theory, tagged adjoint functors, MaBloWriMo, universal properties on November 1, 2009 | 1 Comment »
Charles Siegel over at Rigorous Trivialities suggested a NaNoWriMo for math bloggers: instead of writing a 50,000-word novel, just write a blog post every day. I have to admit I rather like the idea, so we’ll see if I can keep it up. Continuing the previous post, what we want to do now is to [...]
Some adjoint functors
Posted in category theory, representation theory, tagged abstract nonsense, adjoint functors, Galois theory, universal properties on October 27, 2009 | 4 Comments »
Note: as usual, I will be playing free and loose with category theory in this post. Apologies to those who know better. One way to define a subgroup of a group is as the image of a homomorphism into . Given the inclusion map , the functor in the category of groups acts contravariantly to [...]