In the previous post we described the Heisenberg picture of quantum mechanics, which can be phrased quite generally as follows: given a noncommutative algebra (the algebra of observables of some quantum system) and a Hamiltonian , we obtain a derivation , which is (up to some scalar multiple) the infinitesimal generator of time evolution. This [...]
Archive for the ‘Lie theory’ Category
Poisson algebras and the classical limit
Posted in abstract algebra, classical mechanics, homological algebra, Lie theory, quantum mechanics, tagged deformation quantization, Hochschild cohomology, Poisson geometry on August 14, 2011 | Leave a Comment »
The representation theory of SU(2)
Posted in group theory, Lie theory, quantum mechanics, representation theory, tagged Stone-Weierstrass on June 26, 2011 | 7 Comments »
Today we will give four proofs of the classification of the (finite-dimensional complex continuous) irreducible representations of (which you’ll recall we assumed way back in this previous post). As a first step, it turns out that the finite-dimensional representation theory of compact groups looks a lot like the finite-dimensional representation theory of finite groups, and [...]
The quaternions and Lie algebras II
Posted in Lie theory, tagged exponentials, quaternions on June 14, 2011 | 1 Comment »
We now know what a Lie algebra is and we know they are abstractions of infinitesimal symmetries, which are given by derivations. Today we will see what we can say about associating infinitesimal symmetries to continuous symmetries: that is, given a matrix Lie group , we will describe its associated Lie algebra of infinitesimal elements [...]
The quaternions and Lie algebras I
Posted in algebraic geometry, Lie theory, linear algebra, tagged derivations, infinitesimals on February 26, 2011 | 1 Comment »
Someone who has just read the previous post on how exponentiating quaternions gives a nice parameterization of might object as follows: “that’s nice and all, but there has to be a general version of this construction for more general Lie groups, right? You can’t always depend on the nice properties of division algebras.” And that [...]
SU(2) and the quaternions
Posted in algebraic topology, group theory, Lie theory, tagged division algebras, quaternions on February 12, 2011 | 4 Comments »
The simplest compact Lie group is the circle . Part of the reason it is so simple to understand is that Euler’s formula gives an extremely nice parameterization of its elements, showing that it can be understood either in terms of the group of elements of norm in (that is, the unitary group ) or [...]
SO(3) and SU(2)
Posted in algebraic topology, group theory, Lie theory, representation theory, tagged exceptional isomorphisms on February 5, 2011 | 4 Comments »
In order to study the hydrogen atom, we’ll need to know something about the representation theory of the special orthogonal group . This post consists of a few preliminaries along the way to doing this. I’ll be somewhat vague about a few things that 1) I don’t have much experience with, and 2) that would [...]