The Artin-Wedderburn theorem shows that the definition of a semisimple ring is enormously restrictive. Even fails to be semisimple! A less restrictive notion, but one that still captures the notion of a ring which can be understood by how it acts on simple (left) modules, is that of a semiprimitive or Jacobson semisimple ring, one [...]
Archive for the ‘abstract algebra’ Category
The Jacobson radical
Posted in module theory, representation theory, ring theory, tagged adjoint functors, quivers on May 30, 2012 | 2 Comments »
Schanuel’s conjecture and the Mandelbrot Competition
Posted in commutative algebra, Putnam / competitions, transcendental number theory, tagged Schanuel's conjecture on April 19, 2012 | 5 Comments »
A student I’m tutoring was working unsuccessfully on the following problem from the 2011 Mandelbrot Competition: Let be positive integers such that . Find the minimum value of . After some tinkering, I concluded that the problem as stated has no solution. I am now almost certain it was printed incorrectly: should be replaced by [...]
Morita equivalence and the bicategory of bimodules
Posted in higher category theory, module theory, ring theory, tagged 2-categories, abstract nonsense, Morita theory, tensor products on February 16, 2012 | 2 Comments »
In the previous post we learned that it is possible to recover the center of a ring from its category of left modules (as an -enriched category). For commutative rings, this justifies the idea that it is sensible to study a ring by studying its modules (since the modules know everything about the ring). For [...]
Centers, 2-categories, and the Eckmann-Hilton argument
Posted in algebraic topology, category theory, higher category theory, module theory, ring theory, tagged 2-categories, abstract nonsense, Eckmann-Hilton, homotopy groups on February 6, 2012 | 4 Comments »
The center of a group is an interesting construction: it associates to every group an abelian group in what is certainly a canonical way, but not a functorial way: that is, it doesn’t extend (at least in any obvious way) to a functor (unlike the abelianization ). We might wonder, then, exactly what kind of [...]
A first blog post on noncommutative rings
Posted in module theory, ring theory, tagged semisimplicity on January 25, 2012 | 3 Comments »
In this post, I’d like to record a few basic definitions and results regarding noncommutative rings. This is a subject clearly of great importance and generality, but I haven’t had much exposure to it, and I’m trying to fix that. I am working mostly from Lam’s A first course in noncommutative rings.
A less biased definition of a group
Posted in category theory, group theory, tagged abstract nonsense on January 16, 2012 | 21 Comments »
Here’s what seems like a silly question: what’s the universal group? That is, what’s the universal example of a set together with maps satisfying the identities , , ? A moment’s reflection shows that there isn’t such a group; the existence of the groups , where is an arbitrary set, shows that there exist groups [...]
Constructing Poisson algebras
Posted in commutative algebra, module theory, tagged Poisson geometry on August 27, 2011 | Leave a Comment »
(Commutative) Poisson algebras are clearly very interesting, so it would be nice to have ways of constructing examples. We know that is a Poisson algebra with bracket uniquely defined by ; this describes a classical particle in one dimension, and is the classical limit of a quantum particle in one dimension (essentially the Weyl algebra). [...]
Poisson algebras and the classical limit
Posted in abstract algebra, classical mechanics, homological algebra, Lie theory, quantum mechanics, tagged deformation quantization, Hochschild cohomology, Poisson geometry on August 14, 2011 | Leave a Comment »
In the previous post we described the Heisenberg picture of quantum mechanics, which can be phrased quite generally as follows: given a noncommutative algebra (the algebra of observables of some quantum system) and a Hamiltonian , we obtain a derivation , which is (up to some scalar multiple) the infinitesimal generator of time evolution. This [...]
The Heisenberg picture of quantum mechanics
Posted in abstract algebra, quantum mechanics, tagged harmonic oscillator on July 16, 2011 | 7 Comments »
In an earlier post we introduced the Schrödinger picture of quantum mechanics, which can be summarized as follows: the state of a quantum system is described by a unit vector in some Hilbert space (up to multiplication by a constant), and time evolution is given by where is a self-adjoint operator on called the Hamiltonian. [...]
The representation theory of SU(2)
Posted in group theory, Lie theory, quantum mechanics, representation theory, tagged Stone-Weierstrass on June 26, 2011 | 7 Comments »
Today we will give four proofs of the classification of the (finite-dimensional complex continuous) irreducible representations of (which you’ll recall we assumed way back in this previous post). As a first step, it turns out that the finite-dimensional representation theory of compact groups looks a lot like the finite-dimensional representation theory of finite groups, and [...]