The Artin-Wedderburn theorem shows that the definition of a semisimple ring is enormously restrictive. Even fails to be semisimple! A less restrictive notion, but one that still captures the notion of a ring which can be understood by how it acts on simple (left) modules, is that of a semiprimitive or Jacobson semisimple ring, one [...]
Archive for the ‘math’ Category
The Jacobson radical
Posted in module theory, representation theory, ring theory, tagged adjoint functors, quivers on May 30, 2012 | 2 Comments »
Schanuel’s conjecture and the Mandelbrot Competition
Posted in commutative algebra, Putnam / competitions, transcendental number theory, tagged Schanuel's conjecture on April 19, 2012 | 5 Comments »
A student I’m tutoring was working unsuccessfully on the following problem from the 2011 Mandelbrot Competition: Let be positive integers such that . Find the minimum value of . After some tinkering, I concluded that the problem as stated has no solution. I am now almost certain it was printed incorrectly: should be replaced by [...]
The Yoneda lemma I
Posted in algebraic geometry, category theory, order theory, tagged abstract nonsense on April 2, 2012 | 4 Comments »
For two categories let denote the functor category, whose objects are functors and whose morphisms are natural transformations. For a locally small category, the Yoneda embedding is the functor sending an object to the contravariant functor and sending a morphism to the natural transformation given by composition. The goal of the next few posts is [...]
Morita equivalence and the bicategory of bimodules
Posted in higher category theory, module theory, ring theory, tagged 2-categories, abstract nonsense, Morita theory, tensor products on February 16, 2012 | 2 Comments »
In the previous post we learned that it is possible to recover the center of a ring from its category of left modules (as an -enriched category). For commutative rings, this justifies the idea that it is sensible to study a ring by studying its modules (since the modules know everything about the ring). For [...]
Centers, 2-categories, and the Eckmann-Hilton argument
Posted in algebraic topology, category theory, higher category theory, module theory, ring theory, tagged 2-categories, abstract nonsense, Eckmann-Hilton, homotopy groups on February 6, 2012 | 4 Comments »
The center of a group is an interesting construction: it associates to every group an abelian group in what is certainly a canonical way, but not a functorial way: that is, it doesn’t extend (at least in any obvious way) to a functor (unlike the abelianization ). We might wonder, then, exactly what kind of [...]
A first blog post on noncommutative rings
Posted in module theory, ring theory, tagged semisimplicity on January 25, 2012 | 3 Comments »
In this post, I’d like to record a few basic definitions and results regarding noncommutative rings. This is a subject clearly of great importance and generality, but I haven’t had much exposure to it, and I’m trying to fix that. I am working mostly from Lam’s A first course in noncommutative rings.
A less biased definition of a group
Posted in category theory, group theory, tagged abstract nonsense on January 16, 2012 | 21 Comments »
Here’s what seems like a silly question: what’s the universal group? That is, what’s the universal example of a set together with maps satisfying the identities , , ? A moment’s reflection shows that there isn’t such a group; the existence of the groups , where is an arbitrary set, shows that there exist groups [...]
Estimating roots
Posted in analysis, tagged estimation on December 5, 2011 | 9 Comments »
In lieu of a real blog post, which will have to wait for at least another two weeks, let me offer an estimation exercise: bound, as best you can, the unique positive real root of the polynomial . The intermediate value theorem shows that , which was the subject of a recent math.SE question that [...]
Morality
Posted in category theory, remarks, tagged abstract nonsense on October 17, 2011 | 6 Comments »
Apologies for the lack of updates; I’ve been attempting to apply to graduate school. In the meantime, I want to link to a fantastic paper I just heard about by Eugenia Cheng on moral truth in mathematics. In private (or for me, on MathOverflow), mathematicians often say things like “well, morally, this should be true [...]
Constructing Poisson algebras
Posted in commutative algebra, module theory, tagged Poisson geometry on August 27, 2011 | Leave a Comment »
(Commutative) Poisson algebras are clearly very interesting, so it would be nice to have ways of constructing examples. We know that is a Poisson algebra with bracket uniquely defined by ; this describes a classical particle in one dimension, and is the classical limit of a quantum particle in one dimension (essentially the Weyl algebra). [...]