Kent Merryfield continues his tradition of posting the Putnam results every year. Before I came to MIT I didn’t understand why this was necessary, but after taking it I learned that the results are only sent to the relevant officials at each school, who distribute the results in a manner of their choosing. This seems to me to be a pretty inefficient system, and I’ve never really understood why it’s done this way, so kudos to Dr. Merryfield for making this information more widely available.

## Putnam 2009

March 18, 2010 by Qiaochu Yuan

Posted in Putnam / competitions | 4 Comments

### 4 Responses

### Leave a Reply Cancel reply

## Recent Comments

## Blogroll

- Academically Interesting
- Azimuth
- Climbing Mount Bourbaki
- Combinatorics and more
- Concrete Nonsense
- E. Kowalski’s blog
- Geometry and the imagination
- Gowers’s Weblog
- John Baez’s Stuff
- Michael Nielsen
- Portrait of a Mathematician
- Quomodocumque
- Secret Blogging Seminar
- Shtetl-Optimized
- Sketches of Topology
- The n-Category Cafe
- Todd and Vishal’s blog
- Vi Hart – Blog
- What's new
- XOR's Hammer

## Categories

## Archives

- June 2014
- April 2014
- December 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- January 2009

## Tag Cloud

2-categories 4-manifolds abstract nonsense adjoint functors asymptotics cartesian closed categories Catalan numbers characteristic classes Chebyshev polynomials cohomology continued fractions Coxeter groups deformation quantization determinants diagrammatic algebra Dynkin diagrams elliptic curves enriched categories estimation Euler characteristic exceptional isomorphisms finite fields fixed point theorems Fourier transforms Frobenius map generating functions group actions groupoids harmonic oscillator Hecke algebras Hilbert series homotopy groups internal hom intuitionistic logic lattices Lawvere theories MaBloWriMo math and the internet MathOverflow Mobius inversion modular forms moments monoidal categories Morita theory noncommutative probability Nullstellensatz orthogonal polynomials partition functions pedagogy philosophy of mathematics physical intuition Poincare duality profinite groups PROMYS q-analogues quadratic reciprocity quantum groups quaternions quivers reconstruction theorems regular languages representation theory of the symmetric group self-reference species theory supersymmetry symmetric functions ultrafilters universality universal properties walks on graphs Yoneda lemma Young tableaux zeta functions

on March 19, 2010 at 12:41 am |Vishal LamaCongrats on making it into the Honorable Mention list!

on March 19, 2010 at 5:02 am |2009 Putnam results « problemas | teoremas[...] 19, 2010 in Matemática, Math, Putnam | Tags: Matemática, Math De ontem (via Qiaochu Yuan, Annoying [...]

on March 19, 2010 at 6:56 am |harrisonAnd even if the relevant official is fine with giving out the information, sometimes it’ll arrive during spring break, for example…

Congratulations again! If my calculations aren’t way off, I think I must have missed HM by just a couple of points — that or I was the only person in the top 200 to miss A1 (or I somehow missed the top 200, which makes no sense whatsoever).

on March 22, 2010 at 11:05 am |KenyaiCongratulations on the Honorable Mention! Quite an accomplishment indeed.

I am thinking I may have to send an email to our exam proctor… it seems he has completely forgotten to keep us updated.